This is a demonstration with entirely fictional data. All names, events, documents, and legal claims on this page are made up to illustrate how Cloud Counsel works. Nothing here depicts real privileged information, attorney-client communications, or actual case materials.

See Cloud Counsel in Action

Explore how a real employment law case comes together on our platform—from the first event statement through AI-powered claim analysis and attorney collaboration. Click on names, documents, and features to learn more.

Rodriguez v. Talworth Digital Solutions

Maria Rodriguez, Marketing Director at Talworth Digital Solutions, was placed on a Performance Improvement Plan three weeks after filing an HR complaint about discriminatory comments from her supervisor. Two months later, she was terminated. This is how she built her case.

Fictional timeline data for illustration only.

MR
Hired at Talworth Digital Solutions
March 2020Employment

Maria began employment as Marketing Manager at Talworth Digital Solutions in McLean, Virginia. Annual salary $95,000. Received offer letter and signed employmen...

2 1 Reviewed by your attorney
MR
Promoted to Marketing Director
June 2023Employment

Maria promoted to Director of Marketing with salary increase to $128,000. Year-end performance review rated "Exceeds Expectations" across all categories. Derek ...

2 1 Reviewed by your attorney
MR
Discriminatory Comments Begin
May 2025Discrimination
Description

After returning from maternity leave, Derek Huang began making comments about Maria's "fit" and "commitment level." In a team meeting on May 14, Derek said: "I need people who are here, not people whose heads are at home." James Okafor was present and heard the comments.

How Do You Know?

I was present for these comments. They were made directly to me and in front of my team.

People Involved
Derek Huang James Okafor
Harms
Emotional Distress
Reviewed by your attorney
MR
Formal Complaint to HR
July 2025Protected Activity
Description

Maria submitted a written complaint to Patricia Wells, HR Director, detailing Derek's pattern of discriminatory comments following her return from maternity leave. HR acknowledged receipt by email but took no visible investigative action.

People Involved
Patricia Wells
Documents
HR Complaint Email23 KB · Sep 9, 2025 · Maria Rodriguez
HR Acknowledgment Email12 KB · Sep 9, 2025 · Maria Rodriguez
Reviewed by your attorney
MR
Performance Improvement Plan Issued
August 2025Adverse Action
Description

Three weeks after the HR complaint, Derek placed Maria on a 60-day Performance Improvement Plan citing "declining performance metrics." No prior written performance warnings existed. Maria's Q2 numbers exceeded department targets.

How Do You Know?

I received the PIP document directly from Derek in a private meeting. I have the original with his signature.

People Involved
Derek Huang
Documents
PIP Document189 KB · Sep 10, 2025 · Maria Rodriguez
Q2 Performance Report456 KB · Sep 10, 2025 · Maria Rodriguez
Harms
Emotional DistressEconomic
Reviewed by your attorney
MR
Contacted J. Madison PLC
September 2025Case Management

Maria began building her case file on Cloud Counsel. Identified key witnesses, uploaded employment documents, and started constructing a detailed timeline of ev...

1 Reviewed by your attorney
MR
Terminated
October 2025Adverse Action

Tom Archer (CEO) terminated Maria's employment citing "failure to meet PIP objectives." The termination letter references performance issues that directly contr...

1 1 1 2 Reviewed by your attorney
MR
EEOC Charge Filed
November 2025Legal Proceeding

J. Madison PLC filed a dual EEOC charge on Maria's behalf: Title VII gender discrimination and Title VII retaliation for protected complaint activity. Charge in...

2 Reviewed by your attorney

Fictional claim analysis. Scores and assessments are illustrative, not legal advice.

Statute of Limitations

SAFE

Within filing period. EEOC charge filed timely. Title VII requires charge within 300 days of last discriminatory act — met with margin.

Learn about SOL tracking

Title VII Retaliation

85/100
Strong
Protected ActivityWritten HR complaint on July 2025
Employer KnowledgeHR acknowledged receipt by email
Adverse ActionPIP issued 3 weeks post-complaint; terminated
Causal ConnectionStrong temporal proximity (21 days)
Learn about AI claim analysis

Title VII Gender Discrimination

68/100
Moderate
Protected ClassSex/gender; post-maternity-leave targeting
Qualified for PositionPromotion + excellent reviews pre-leave
Adverse ActionPIP and termination
Comparator EvidenceNeed evidence of male peers treated differently
Learn about AI claim analysis

Fictional exchange. Not a depiction of actual privileged communications.

Discussion on: Performance Improvement Plan Issued
MR
Maria Rodriguez

The PIP document says my Q2 numbers were "below target" but I have the actual Q2 report showing I exceeded every metric. Derek never mentioned performance concerns before my HR complaint.

Sep 15, 2025 at 3:42 PM
JS
Attorney Small

That's very helpful. Do you have any emails from before the complaint where Derek praised your work or acknowledged strong results? Those would directly contradict the PIP narrative.

Sep 15, 2025 at 4:18 PM
MR
Maria Rodriguez

Yes! He sent a company-wide email in April calling my Q1 campaign "the best launch we've ever had." I'll upload it now.

Sep 15, 2025 at 4:31 PM
Learn about secure collaboration
JO
James Okafor
Witness & Contributor
Star Witness
Corroborating Statement: Discriminatory Comments

"I was in the May 14 team meeting when Derek made those comments about Maria. He specifically said 'I need people who are here' while looking at Maria. It was uncomfortable for everyone in the room. Two other team members exchanged looks. Derek had never said anything like that before Maria went on maternity leave."

Learn about witness collaboration

Ready to Build Your Case?

Cloud Counsel puts the tools in your hands. Build your case at no cost—strong case files get noticed.